{"id":2948,"date":"2019-03-07T11:48:51","date_gmt":"2019-03-07T19:48:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/?p=2948"},"modified":"2019-03-07T11:48:51","modified_gmt":"2019-03-07T19:48:51","slug":"punch-gets-first-50-ring-gauge-smoke","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/?p=2948","title":{"rendered":"Punch Gets First 50 Ring Gauge Smoke"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>By:\u00a0<a title=\"See more from David Savona\" href=\"https:\/\/www.cigaraficionado.com\/author\/david-savona\">David Savona<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Posted on: March 5, 2019<\/p>\n<p>Punch cigars have been made for a long, long time, but until now the Cuban brand never had a 50-ring-gauge smoke in its regular-production portfolio. That\u2019s all changing with the launch of the Punch Short de Punch, a short but fat smoke that expands this venerable Cuban brand, which has been made for more than 170 years.<\/p>\n<p>The new Punch Short de Punch, which was announced\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.cigaraficionado.com\/tags\/habanos-festival-2019\">at the Habanos Festival<\/a>\u00a0two weeks ago, is 4 3\/4 inches long by 50 ring, a size called Para\u00edso in Cuban cigar factories. It\u2019s one of the shortest cigars brought out at the show, and it falls between the petit robusto and the traditional robusto size in terms of length. You won\u2019t find another cigar in the regular Habanos portfolio with quite the same dimensions.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.cigaraficionado.com\/article\/cuba-s-punch-brand-gets-first-50-ring-smoke\">Read more&#8230;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By:\u00a0David Savona Posted on: March 5, 2019 Punch cigars have been made for a long, long time, but until now the Cuban brand never had a 50-ring-gauge smoke in its regular-production portfolio. That\u2019s all changing with the launch of the Punch Short de Punch, a short but fat smoke that expands this venerable Cuban brand,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":18,"featured_media":2949,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-2948","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-cigar-news"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/18"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2948"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2950,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948\/revisions\/2950"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/2949"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/canadacigarforum.com\/homev3\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}